вÊÍø

Skip to content
Contact вÊÍø

Does My Project Need IRB Review?Ìý

There are a few categories of research-related projects that do not meet the definition of Human Subject Research, which means they may not require IRB review. Please refer to the list below for the most common on these situations.

If you are still unsure whether your project requires IRB review, we recommend that you submit a Human Subjects Research Determination Form. This form can be found in the IRBNet library and should be submitted through IRBNet. Upon receipt of your HSR Determination Form, it will be forwarded to an IRB member for review (reviewers have up to 7 business days to review Determination Forms; Please keep this in mind when deciding to submit your form). If it is determined that your project does not meet the definition of HSR, you will receive a letter confirming this determination.Ìý

1. Class Projects, Research Practica, and Undergraduate Thesis Projects

Class projects, Research Practica, and Undergraduate Thesis ProjectsÌýinvolving research methodology and course-assigned data collection. These activities generally do not constitute researchÌýbecause their purpose is to provide training in research as part of theÌýoverall educational mission of a program and are not designed toÌýcontribute to new knowledge. However, for example, if a student isÌýinvolved in an activity designed to teach research methodologies and the instructor or student wishes to conduct further investigation and analysesÌýin order to contribute to scholarly knowledge, the design of the projectÌýhas changed such that it meets the above definition of research andÌýrequires вÊÍø IRB review. Regardless of when this change occurs, вÊÍø IRBÌýmust at this time review the research.

Course instructors are responsible for assessing whether these activities meet the definition of research as delineated above and require IRB review. All research protocols submitted by students as required by their instructors will be reviewed. It is the responsibility of the faculty member to review a student's IRB research protocol for accuracy and completeness prior to it being submitted for review.Ìý

2. Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement

Improvement activities thatÌýattempt to measure the effectiveness of programs or services such asÌýprogram evaluations, model curriculums, or needs assessments. SuchÌýactivities are not typically designed to be generalizable to the largerÌýcommunity and would be not be considered researchÌýifÌýresults willÌýnot be compared with other assessments. Those responsible for suchÌýprojects must be certain that their activities are not human research.

3. Repository Research, Tissue Banking, and Databases

Repository Research, Tissue Banking, and Databases utilizing stored data or materials (cells, tissues, fluids, and body parts). If theÌýinvestigator cannot readily ascertain the identity of the subject fromÌýwhom the data or materials originated (i.e. the data is stripped ofÌýidentifying information or coded and the investigator does not haveÌýaccess to the key), these activities would not require вÊÍø IRB review. However,Ìýrepository research, tissue banking, and databases utilizing stored dataÌýor materials (cells, tissues, fluids, and body parts) from individuallyÌýidentifiable living persons must be reviewed by вÊÍø IRB.

4. Case Reports

Case reports utilizing private identifiable information such asÌýmedical information collected from a clinical activity. Case reports areÌýgenerally carried out by retrospective review of records and highlight aÌýuniqueÌýtreatment, case, or outcome. As the collection andÌýorganization of informationÌýfor such reports usually involves no data analysis or testing of aÌýhypothesis, they do not involve systematic investigation. Therefore,Ìýsingle case reports are not research and would not require вÊÍø IRB review.ÌýHowever, retrospective record reviews that incorporate data collection and data analysis to answer a research question must undergo вÊÍø IRB review.ÌýAdditionally, meta-analysis of multiple case reports to examine andÌýcompare interventions or cases is considered to be human subjectsÌýresearch.

5.Ìý Research on Institutions or Social Processes

When the intent or focus of the research is to gainÌýknowledge of an institution or social process (e.g., a political party,Ìýlabor negotiations) and this research is not intended to produceÌý generalizable knowledge about any particular individual or groups ofÌýindividuals. Often, investigators wish to collect information fromÌýindividuals about institutions or social processes. Such an activity isÌýnotÌýhuman subjects research when the focus of the research is not on characteristicsÌýof an individual or groups of individuals because the information collected from the informant is not about the informant. There is often aÌýfine line between human subjects research and research that collectsÌýinformation from individuals in order to understand institutions or socialÌýprocesses.ÌýResearch on institutions or social processes, theÌýpurpose of which is to create generalizable knowledge about the attitudes, beliefs, or behaviors of individuals or groups (e.g., voters, prisoners,Ìýemployees, teachers) as being representative of these institutions orÌýsocial processes, is human subjects research.